Why Algebra Matters (and Why Andrew Hacker is Off-Target)
Even as America’s and the world’s economic and social landscape become more knowledge-based, and math and science become even more-integral to career and entrepreneurial success, there are still folks who insist that our children don’t need to master Algebra, trigonometry, and other high-level math skills. The latest came courtesy of the New York Times from Andrew Hacker, an emeritus political science professor at City University of New York’s Queens College, who declares that giving kids strong instruction and curricula in math is unnecessary. Why? From his perspective, “making mathematics mandatory prevents us from discovering and developing young talent”, and is “depleting our pool of brain power”.
Citing the percentages of kids failing math on state tests in Oklahoma and West Virginia , and giving weight to anecdotes from teachers (who apparently don’t take responsibility for their own failures in instruction), Hacker argues that forcing children to take “onerous” Algebra courses means putting them on the path to academic and social failure. From where he sits, teaching algebra to kids is especially cruel because he doesn’t believe that there is any evidence that it and other high-level mathematics are necessary for economic social success.
The fact that Hacker doesn’t consider that the nation’s education crisis — and the low quality of math instruction and curricula — is the underlying reason why so many kids are failing algebra makes his piece an entirely laughable polemic. Nor does he give any thought to the low quality of math training at the nation’s university schools of education — including evidence that just two out of 63 university school of education elementary math programs surveyed by the National Council of Teacher Quality met or exceeded standards for training math teachers — is a critical factor in the low quality of math instruction, especially in the early grades. Nor has Hacker given any thought to the reality that only one out of 63 elementary math programs surveyed by the U.S. Department of Education have been rated as having “potentially positive” effects on student achievement; the dearth of rigor in math curricula is nearly as abysmal as that in reading.
Meanwhile Hacker’s main thesis — that forcing kids to take algebra means losing talented young minds — falls on its face when one considers that one of the reasons why so many kids are innumerate is because they are also illiterate. The very skills involved in reading (including understanding abstract concepts) are also involved in algebra and other complex mathematics. Those students who are struggling in reading almost always struggle with math (as well as science), especially as they move into sixth grade, when math lessons transition from computation to word problems that require thinking through abstractions. And reading (along with strong background knowledge gained from history and other subjects) is critical is to building the muscle needed to handle math. In short, contrary to Hacker’s conceit, the “brainpower” of these young minds (including the 150 who drop out every hour into poverty and prison) were wasted by American public education’s inability to provide high-quality instruction, curricula, and cultures of genius long before they encountered an algebraic equation.
If anything, kids who take high-level math courses and plenty of them over time are more-likely to graduate from high school and complete higher education. As California State University, Fullerton psychologist Allen W. Gottfried has noted, the earlier children get into math courses and succeed in mastering computations and equations, the more-likely they will take on new challenges in other subjects. Essentially, challenging courses, teachers, and cultures of genius equal children who will succeed in school and in life.
Meanwhile Hacker fails to look closely at what is really happening in the global economy. As Dropout Nation has noted for the past few years, strong math and science skills are critical to our children having long-term success in adulthood (and in helping poor and minority kids emerge into the middle class). The advent of the Internet and the emergence of quantifiable data is making math skills critical to many white-collar professions; marketers and public relations staffers, for example, have to understand the arcane aspects of statistics in order to analyze data on ad campaigns, while reporters and editorialists need stronger math skills as well. The need for strong math skills has become even more-critical in high-paying blue-collar professions. Welders, for example, need to understand trigonometric equations and think through abstractions (along with master computer programming language such as C and Fortran) in order to ensure that products are shaped properly and fit together upon assembly. Elevator installers and repairmen, who are paid an average of $67,000 annually, must understand electrical and mechanical engineering (which comes from mastering high-level math) for their own jobs.
As the importance of strong math skills continues to grow in the coming decades, the economic prospects for the low-skilled will continue to decline. As McKinsey & Co. pointed out last month in its study on the global demand for high-skilled labor, the percentage of labor-intensive, or low-skilled assembly and factory line jobs declined by half since the 1970s; low-skilled jobs as a percentage of all manufacturing positions declined by 29 percent, while the percentage of manufacturing jobs in capital- and knowledge-intensive areas — those requiring strong math, science, and computer language skills — have (and will continue to) increase. As seen in Germany, where nearly all low-skilled manufacturing jobs have gone into the ether, there will be few jobs for those kids who emerge into adulthood without the ability to handle algebraic equations as simple as 5x +2 = 3x + 10. (By the way, x=4.)
Hacker, of course, would respond to this by noting educational psychologist John P. Smith III’s argument that there are some differences between the kind of math activities done in the world of work and what is taught in schools. This is true to a degree. One of the biggest problems in American public education is that so many high-level courses fail to show kids the connections between the math work in classrooms and the real world activities upon which math and science concepts are built. This is why Dropout Nation advocates for efforts such as the Minddrive program in Kansas City, Mo., in which students learn the uses of 3D modeling, trigonometry, and electrical engineering in designing and building cars. At the same time, the reality is that no school can ever fully prepare children for all the challenges of the working world; that’s not within the capacities of any human endeavor. But that doesn’t matter. The reality is that children need strong mastery of the basics — including higher-level math — in order to take on the greater demands in the office and on the factory floor. When kids don’t master algebra while in school, they won’t be able to succeed in the working world outside it.
It would be kind to say that Hacker’s piece is a laughable polemic. But it is more than that. In advocating that most kids just aren’t capable of mastering algebra, Hacker perpetuates the education traditionalist conceit that only some kids are capable of strong, comprehensive, college-preparatory learning (and the cultures of low expectations in dropout factories, failure mills, and warehouses of mediocrity) that is a critical factor in the nation’s education crisis. Given the success of schools such as those run by KIPP, Rocketship Education, and even Catholic diocesan schools in helping kids gain the mastery they need for success in life, Hacker’s statement is not just wrong, but intellectually false and morally despicable.
Meanwhile in arguing that “potential poets and philosophers” (and just about everyone else not taking on the sciences) shouldn’t have to master algebra, Hacker ignores the reality that strong math knowledge (along with literacy and science understanding) is critical to understanding the abstract concepts at the very heart of civilization and society. An adult with a working student with a working understanding of algebra will also be able to understand why the Laffer Curve matters in discussions about tax cuts, and be able to weigh the benefits and consequences of the Affordable Care Act on government, the private sector, and civil society. It also allows for the social mobility that has helped America bend the arc of economic and social history toward progress. A bus driver who understands calculus and trigonometry can move up socially, converse with executives, serve as a leader in his community, and even help his kids make their way into the middle class.
What Hacker should be doing is joining alongside school reformers to advance the transformation of American public education. This includes overhauling how we recruit and train aspiring math and science teachers (including selecting those with strong math competency, talent as entrepreneurial self-starters who can run classrooms on their own and develop innovative approaches to instruction, and empathy and care for all children). It also includes improving how schools teach math in the early grades, which includes providing intense math and reading remediation for struggling students before they reach fourth grade. And it means expanding school choice, Parent Power, and access to data on school performance (the subject of this week’s Dropout Nation Podcast) in order for families to make smart decisions on behalf of their kids; a a study released this month by a team led by Judith Harackiewicz of the University of Wisconsin-Madison has shown, families who are well-informed about math and science courses can help steer their kids onto the right path.
Those who argue, as Hacker weakly tried to do, that algebra isn’t necessary for lifelong success are essentially articulating foolish thinking that does little to advance the much-needed overhaul of American public education. Hacker’s piece belongs on one of those garbage barges that head out of the Big Apple each day to places unknown — and nowhere else.
14 Comments
14 Trackbacks
-
[...] Kids who can’t understand math usually can’t read well either, writes RiShawn Biddle on Dropout Nation. “The very skills involved in reading (including understanding abstract concepts) are also involved in algebra and other complex mathematics.” [...]
-
[...] Rob Knop, a professor and physics blogger; Valerie Strauss, a professor and psychologist, and RiShawn Biddle, a writer, editor and blogger on educational [...]
-
[...] Hacker’s article has already attracted several persuasive responses, including, for example, an op-ed on the Scientific American website. Some other responses include blogs by Rob Knop, Daniel Willingham and RiShawn Biddle. [...]
-
[...] school, they still may not get the comprehensive, college-preparatory courses in subjects such as algebra that they need to do well in college and in life. This is particularly clear at Mills, which is [...]
-
[...] And see blogs by Rob Knop, Daniel Willingham and RiShawn Biddle. [...]
-
[...] And see blogs by Rob Knop and RiShawn Biddle. [...]
-
[...] Reasonably a few people have responded to Hacker’s column already. I highly recommend these posts by Rob Knop, Daniel Willingham, and RiShawn Biddle. [...]
-
[...] from the scientific community has been overwhelmingly negative (some interesting examples are here, here and [...]
-
[...] week’s Dropout Nation critique of political science professor Andrew Hacker’s thesis that America’s children [...]
-
[...] on the Rise: Infections Have Doubled in 5 Years HIDDEN HEALTH – PART 1: The culture club Why Algebra Matters (and Why Andrew Hacker is Off-Target) Ambiguity in phylogenies Looking Outside the Brain for Mental Illness Bacteria cities cannot form [...]
-
[...] expectations such as Queens College professor emeritus and opponent of teaching higher-level math Andrew Hacker (as well as the writers of Harvard’s Pathways to Prosperity report from a year earlier). [...]
-
[...] Why Algebra Matters (and Why Andrew Hacker is Off-Target) by RiShawn Biddle [...]
-
[...] Why Algebra Matters (and Why Andrew Hacker is Off-Target) by RiShawn Biddle [...]

Clark Starr
293 days ago
Teaching “algebra” as a required subject to 9th graders is useless. It will inspire none of them to go on to science or math-based careers (whether in the private sector or in research institutions). In fact, it will, as Hacker points out, demoralize many to the point that the success of their academic–and hence professional–lives is severely diminished. Rather, embedding algebra–and other foundational elements of science subjects–into courses that teach kids to DO something (build a car, write and record a song, plan a city, etc.) is what should be done. We are loosing potential innovators to our current math curriculum requirements.
Jon Hagen
293 days ago
Algebra is not an isolated hurdle. Without algebra, a student is unable to take any solid course in chemistry, physics, statistics, engineering, or computer science. Mathematics, an academic subject, is seldom, if ever, picked up or taught in the workplace.
tyler whitehouse
293 days ago
oh goodness. clark starr seems to have “loosed” his perspective on what is required to learn technical and symbolic subject matters. while algebra, trig, and calculus are only vehicles towards a larger understanding of things, you actually can’t really learn them in some holistic way. you just roll up your sleeves and go to work.
if learning mathematics by rote is such a waste of time, then why is it so common in the countries that are producing the VAST majority of our science and technology graduate students?
do you really think that students in china and south korea and india are learning about designing cars in the 9th grade? this is doubtful. they are being asked to memorize derivatives and integrals, etc. understanding how a car works may be for physics, but it ain’t for basic math instruction.
as for losing potential innovators because they can’t pass algebra, is it patronizing of me to think this is ridiculous? if you can’t understand linear equations, then there really isn’t anything very complicated at all that you can digest.
Luis Moreno
293 days ago
Andrew Hacker is one of those academic snobs who often tarnish my profession as a mathematics teacher and professor. Let’s turn the tables for a moment.
I didn’t know what I would end up doing from 25 years of age on. All I knew during jr high and high school was that history, as it was taught, was stultifying. Had I failed these interminable courses about Disraeli and Richelieu, I would have been barred from the technological university that I did attend. But I learned some things of use, all the while cursing interminable textbooks on US history.
Now, history is the 8-12 analog of political science that algebra/geometry is of calculus (for instance). Contradicting the previous comment (“it will inspire NONE of them to go on to science or math-based careers”…), ninth and tenth year mathematics were a revelation to me: “You mean that if I just apply these axioms and properties correctly, I can discover something that will be true FOREVER, and to EVERY civilization that will ever exist? Hey, I’ll take this and physics over history any day of the week.”
Thus, Hacker has made the most hasty of generalizations, and it’s telling us about his educational background. I suggest that students who love history and political science keep on hacking at their algebra, for that will make them more rounded students academically, and less like Hacker.
Mike Poller
293 days ago
First they came for Algebra, but I was not a mathematician, so I did not speak up…
Peter Ford
293 days ago
After reading Mr. Moreno’s comments, I have to say only, “I second that emotion.”
inna
293 days ago
could not agree with tyler whitehouse more! clark star has lost it! Technical innovations without the knowledge of elementary Alg? Asia and Europe is laughing at this!
Jim
293 days ago
Algebra isn’t math. It’s calculation.
And we don’t even teach algebra, we drill it.
Until I started doing proofs, I never had a teacher actually get down and explain what we were doing.
Kids are confused by “math” because we don’t explain it to them. We give them a word problem and some examples, with no discussion about what math is, what numbers are, what operations are.
But what would be really great is if, instead of keeping kids on this ridiculous track designed 80 years ago to produce engineers and professional calculators (it was a job before it was a device!), we gave them “pseudo-axiomatic” proofs and problems to do. Real math, just with some of the intricacies smoothed out.
Real math is about exploring the patterns that emerge in the structures of logic. It’s like that old saying, “mathematicians are platonists on weekdays and formalists on sundays.” With simplified proofs and abstract problems, we can get kids understanding this by the time they reach high school.
Then algebra will be no sweat.
Lochern
293 days ago
Four years of college, two graduate degrees and thirteen years of work experience and I have yet to have a job that requires anything more than basic addition and subtraction, and maybe a little multiplying and that includes three years as an inventory control person.
Algebra should still be taught, but it should be optional. Those that like, are good or want to be in the STEM field should have to take algebra and so forth, but for those on the humanities side should have math classes that work on balancing a check book or other practical skills.
I mean I took science for idiot in high school and then took a specialized degree so I could skip out on the math and science requirements as an undergrad and I consider myself successful in my field even though I have a total of two years of math from high school on.
Hilda Lops
292 days ago
Algebraic thinking is used everyday since life is a constant balancing act. Even some of the most notable writers mention it in some of their masterpieces. Think Tolstoy, Hugo, etc..
Algebra is perhaps the single most important subject taught in school.
Erich Prisner
291 days ago
I agree with Luis Moreno. In particular I like the part about the revelation in ninth and tenth grade math. Since so many students struggle with Math and understand so little of it, one of the main features of Math is seldom mentioned. Math is maybe the only subject, where, if you get it, you don’t have to rely on authority at all. It may happen that a student comes home from school and talks about what she learned about French revolution, only to hear from her parents that this is not quite correct—one has to take into account this or that. They just have more, maybe newer information. This can never happen in Math (although parents may know different ways to arrive at a result). Ideally, in Math you have a complete understanding of an admittedly very limited area—this is true since this is true, this is true since that is true, and so on. Ideally, with this complete understanding, you don’t have to memorize a single equation (since you can derive all of them). This is, I guess, what attracts most Math geeks into the field.
Of course, all this is lost for a students once there is a single Math feature a student doesn’t understand. Unless this is fixed soon, all other Math depending on this feature becomes dubious. So one should move slowly and carefully in Math, but one should move.
This also makes Hacker’s proposal to teach statistics instead, or Clark Starr’s idea to integrate Math into project work, questionable (although I like project work, but there needs to be a foundation on which to build). In both cases, Mathematical formulas would be used when needed, looked up somewhere, without any understanding. This is a very sad usage of Mathematics, the same black box understanding we have about virtually everything in life, computers, politics, economics. Everything but mathematics, when done right.
And to all those who claim they never used any Math except addition, subtraction, and multiplication in their work and in their life—what a pity! How do you make even the most simple decisions on your own? If you don’t do the Math, “experts” will do it for you, and you have to rely on what they tell you. Nice new world.
Jamey Spratt
291 days ago
I completely agree with the premise of this article, but would like to add that the failure of the family unit is even more detrimental to a child’s academic progress than America’s public education system. Don’t get me wrong, there is plenty of room for improvement in the system, but I believe the home life of many children is in even bigger trouble. Thanks for writing this article!
Adam Van Hal
290 days ago
To those of you that would make algebra optional already in ninth grade:
I was on of those students that excelled in math/science in high school however, I was horrible at History and English. Should those classes been optional as well? I could argue that those classes stifled me and prevented me from being all I could be. Admittedly, English is important to life so we will ignore it for now. However, History has no purpose in a job I wold get, therefore, why should I study it? I studied it because a starting knowledge in all fields of study creates a well rounded person that is able to participate in society and and interact socially with others. A well rounded person is able to understand the thought processes others use and engage in meaningful debate with them, the foundation of democracy. If we remove courses from the high school curriculum then we are removing the pillars of democracy. All this just because some people complained that math was too hard for them in high school.
High School was the first time I received meaningful science and physics courses. If I did not have the math to understand them then a door would have been shut on me before I had even seen it. High school students do not always know what is best for themselves. Do not leave it up to them to see the importance of an optional class.
bill
287 days ago
People who hire teachers should always ask the candidates some simple math questions… 1. Spell “mathematics”. 2. Name three math subject areas. 3. Finish this equation… E = ___ . 4. What is 7 x 8 6 x 9 7 x 6
Or… they can just take their chances and later find out that if teachers do not know math, they stay away from talking about it in class, as they do science, geography, and penmanship.